Loading…
Thursday April 30, 2026 9:30am - 9:50am EDT
Impact of Autoverification Strategies on Time to Antimicrobial Administration in the Emergency Department  

Jessie Vo, Christopher Campbell, Taylor Gregory, Kelley Norris, Alicia Sanchez 

Background
Autoverification is the process in which a medication is automatically verified after provider order entry, without pharmacist review.  Autoverification of antimicrobials in the emergency department was implemented following health system integration to align with system-wide autoverification practices; however, this was subsequently reverted to reinstate pharmacist verification. Timely administration of antimicrobials has long been recognized as a cornerstone of improving patient outcomes, particularly in those with sepsis. While most autoverification studies focus on quality and process improvement, there is limited data on the impact on clinical outcomes. To address this gap, this study examined if there is a difference in timely administration between autoverified and pharmacist verified antimicrobials. 

Methods
A retrospective chart review of patients bedded in the adult and pediatric emergency departments who received an initial dose of oral or parenteral antimicrobial between November 16th, 2024 and January 16th, 2025, was conducted. Eligible patients were separated into two groups: the control group, during which autoverification of antimicrobials was permitted, and the intervention group, during which autoverification of antimicrobials was not allowed. The primary outcome was administration of antimicrobials within one hour of order entry. Secondary outcomes included pharmacist intervention rates and alerts per 100 orders.   

Results

A total of 300 orders from 235 patients were included in the analysis, 150 orders in the control group; 150 orders in the intervention group. Significant differences in patient demographics were observed for age, race, and infections (abdominal, bloodstream/catheter-related, empiric/unknown). A significant difference was also observed in the order characteristics for the dispense location. One hundred and three (68.7%) orders in the control group and 87 (58%) of orders in the intervention group were administered within one hour (x2 = 3.67, (p = 0.055)).  Compared with the control group, the intervention group observed higher rates of pharmacist intervention (1.33 vs 20 per 100 orders; IRR, 15; 95% CI, 3.58–62.7) and alerts (58 vs 104 per 100 orders; IRR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.38–2.33). 

Conclusion
This study found no difference in administration of antimicrobials within one hour between the control and intervention groups. The intervention group generated more alerts and required greater pharmacist involvement. Together, these findings suggest that excluding antimicrobials from autoverification does not negatively impact timely administration of antimicrobials and may preserve the safety benefits associated with pharmacist verification. 



Contact: [email protected]
Moderators
avatar for David Laurent

David Laurent

Infectious Diseases Clinical Pharmacist, ECU Health
Presenters
avatar for Jessie Vo

Jessie Vo

PGY-1 Pharmacy Resident, Wellstar MCG Health
Evaluators
avatar for Deborah Hobbs

Deborah Hobbs

Associate Chief, Pharmacy, Carl Vinson VA Medical Center
PGY-1 Pharmacy Residency Program Director & Associate Chief, Pharmacy for Clinical Services at the Carl Vinson VA Medical Center. Chairperson Pro-Tem 2021
Thursday April 30, 2026 9:30am - 9:50am EDT
Olympia 2

Sign up or log in to save this to your schedule, view media, leave feedback and see who's attending!

Share Modal

Share this link via

Or copy link